Flicker-driven brain waves and alpha rhythms – revisited

In our recent study we asked how waves that the brain produces by itself – alpha rhythms – relate to waves triggered by viewing a flickering screen. Both can be of similar frequency (~10Hz, or ten cycles per second) and are easily recorded from the scalp with electrodes (EEG). To recap, we did not find much evidence for a strong link between the two types of brain waves (more info).

However, there are many ways to produce a flicker, and virtually any rhythmic change in a stimulus will likely drive a measurable brain wave. In experiments we typically use rhythmic changes in brightness (light on/off) or contrast (imagine flipping a checkerboard with its mirror image). Less frequently we use changes along other dimensions of visual properties (e.g. colour, motion). But even within a given property dimension there is a lot of wiggle room in the choice of stimulation parameters – some experiments employ low intensity/low contrast stimuli (as we did) others use intense, full contrast checkerboards.

We know that the properties of the flicker can have a profound influence on the shape of the brain waves they are driving. In brief, waves can look more and less sinusoidal depending on stimulation. The best way to visualise this is to look at EEG spectra (- basically a ledger of the sinusoidal oscillations that make up the EEG-recorded waves). If you only see a peak at the flicker rate (say 10 Hz) then the brain wave elicited by the stimulation will be nearly sinusoidal. If other peaks show up at 20, 30 Hz and so on (multiples of 10), then chances are high your waveform looks more rugged.

With all that in mind it is worth considering that different waveforms, produced by different flickers while keeping the frequency constant, may influence the results of an experiment. Looking at our data, is there a possibility that we would have arrived at different conclusions with an alternative flicker approach?

In our experiment we used a relatively unique approach of smooth contrast changes. Put briefly, we presented a slightly changed version of the stimulus on each frame (= one picture of a movie) of the stimulation. A more typical approach is to switch a stimulus on and off repeatedly to arrive at a similar presentation rate. Would this type of flicker produce a similar pattern of results?

I was able to check this in data from an older study. This experiment had a similar set up with flickering stimuli presented on the left (rate = 10.6 Hz) and right (14.2 Hz). Crucially, here stimuli were simply switched on & off to produce the flicker (more info can be found in the original paper). Suffice it to say that (N = 14) participants were shown a cue (left/right) telling them to focus their attention towards the left or right stimulus for the rest of the trial (~3sec). As in our recent study, I tested effects of attention on the power of the intrinsic alpha rhythm and flicker-driven brain waves. To do so I used the scripts available on osf.io/apsyf.

alphaFig

Above, we see a very typical pattern in the scalp map: the power of the alpha rhythm lateralises according to the focus of attention. Focusing on the left stimulus reduces alpha power over the right hemisphere and vice versa (- although the effect seems to be relatively weak for the left hemisphere). Looking at the spectra shows higher alpha power in the 8 – 13 Hz alpha frequency band when participants ignored the contralateral stimulus position. Interestingly, we also see that the stimulation is intense enough to produce power peaks visible in the spectra of what we have called ‘ongoing’ power. Note that these peaks do not necessarily carry the alpha suppression effect (10.6 Hz peak, right hemisphere, purple spectra) and may even show a reversed pattern (14.2 Hz peak, left hemisphere, orange spectra).

SSRFig

Also, the results for the stimulus-driven waves look very similar to our first report: A measure of how well the brain repeatedly tracks the flicker on each side shows clear peaks at the stimulation frequencies 10.6 & 14.2 Hz (and a Harmonic). Both responses increase when participants focus on the respective driving stimulus. Scalp maps give an impression of this effect* across recording electrodes.

To cut it short, despite the differences in stimulation, patterns of results of both experiments are very similar. Thus, different stimulation approaches may produce different waveforms while the effects the experimenter intends to measure on the waveforms can remain comparable (at least in our case, for visuo-spatial attention).

 


Thanks to Matt Davidson for prompting this re-analysis on twitter.

* Note that these maps look different from the ones published here. This highlights the influence of factors such as stimulus intensity, location and frequency on the variability of how attention effects project to the scalp.

Flicker-driven brain waves and alpha rhythms

[17 Feb 2019]

Our manuscript Stimulus-driven brain rhythms within the alpha band: The attentional-modulation conundrum has just been accepted for publication in the Journal of Neuroscience. We show that stimulus-driven and intrinsic brain rhythms in the ~10 Hz range (alpha) can be functionally segregated. Briefly put, while one goes up the other one goes down.

In an experiment, we recorded the brain waves of our participants while they were watching a screen with two stimuli. One, shown on the left, flickered at a rate of 10 Hz and another one, shown on the right, flickered at a rate of 12 Hz. (10 Hz flicker means that the stimulus cycles through a change in appearance or is simply switched on and off 10 times per second.) A very prominent notion has it that this type of visual stimulation is capable of taking possession, or “entrain”, the brain’s intrinsic alpha rhythm. The alpha rhythm can be characterised by its *amplitude* – the difference between peaks and troughs or, bluntly put, how strong it is – and its *phase* – when to expect a peak or trough based on its periodicity. From an entrainment perspective, alpha phase is assumed to lock on and align precisely to the periodicity of the visual stimulation.

Note that alpha itself has been looked into for almost a century and alpha phase has been tied to another exciting idea: How our brain processes visual input could be more akin to a camera than the continuous make-believe of our daily experience. Hereby, alpha works as a pacemaker that cuts the real-world continuity into perceptual samples or frames just like still frames of a movie. In line with this idea, experiments have shown that we seem to be less sensitive to “see” brief stimuli that pop up during one part of the alpha cycle – in the camera analogy, when the shutter is down – and more sensitive during another part, i.e. when the shutter is open.

Now, the *combination* of perceptual sampling and entrainment puts experimenters in a formidable position to study alpha’s role in perception. It allows them to manipulate alpha phase and exactly time the presentation of stimuli accordingly. Being able to entrain alpha (or other rhythms) through rhythmic visual stimulation would thus be a versatile and easy-to-apply tool – but does it really work?

In short, our experiment adds to a line of recent studies that challenge a straightforward alpha entrainment using visual flicker. Our main assumption was this: If it looks like alpha and behaves like alpha, then it should be alpha. *It* refers to the brain waves elicited by watching a 10 Hz flicker. Because the brain response shows up as 10-Hz rhythm in the EEG it does *look* like alpha – especially if you look at it in the frequency domain where it produces a neat 10-Hz spectral peak. “Does it behave like alpha?” we translated into “Does it have the same function?”

One very well documented effect is that alpha power (its strength) shifts according to where we attend to. If we focus our attention somewhere to our left (without actually looking there) then alpha power will go down in our right visual brain – due to the cross-wiring of our visual system from eye to cortex, this is where our left visual world is processed. This alpha decrease works like opening the gates for visual input to venture into further stages of processing. Simultaneously, alpha *increases* in the left visual brain, figuratively closing the gates to unattended, irrelevant sights to our right.

Would a brain response driven by our 10/12 Hz stimulation show a similar effect? If so, that would be strong evidence for a close relationship of spontaneous and stimulus-driven alpha brain waves. Using rhythmic flicker to control alpha experimentally would seem like a readily available manipulation. That was not what we found though. On the contrary – we were able to switch between alpha and the stimulus-driven brain waves using slightly different data analysis approaches. Also, attention had the known suppressive effect on alpha while the corresponding (i.e. same-side) stimulus-driven brain response increased.

These results led us to conclude that we are looking at two concurrent neural phenomena, alpha and flicker-driven brain responses. And each one of them seems to provide us with a different perspective on how attention alters our perception.

Find the specifics and references here.


Note 1: Of course, our results do not rule out alpha entrainment, only that an alpha range stimulus-driven brain wave should not be regarded as sufficient to show alpha entrainment. In the paper (and previous literature) we discuss several, possibly additional conditions that need to be satisfied to give rise to the phenomenon.

Note 2: Data and code to reproduce our results are available here. With minor modifications this code should be applicable to other datasets.


Disclaimer: Views expressed in this digest are mine (CK) and not necessarily shared in all their nuances between the co-authors of the manuscript.

Accepted paper on audio-visual synchrony and spatial attention

In this project, spearheaded by first author Amra Covic, we investigated the interplay of synchronised audio-visual (AV) stimuli and paying attention to their location.

AV stimuli typically have a processing advantage over unisensory stimuli. Current accounts ascribe this advantage to a secondary process, an automatic attraction of attention. We were thus surprised to find that AV and spatial attention influenced stimulus processing independently and additively, instead.

Our study made use of the frequency tagging (FT) approach. FT allowed us to keep track of two simultaneously presented stimuli. Classically stimuli flicker by switching them on and off. Here, we implemented an extra stimulus rhythm by periodically changing the shape of our grating-like stimuli (Gabor patches).

The paper has just been accepted for publication in NeuroImage.
Find the final version here: bioRxiv. ~PDF